Ecosystems Indicators Workflows Project

Project overview, work packages and deliverables

Motivation

ARC Industry Laureate research fellowship

Goal: build Australian capacity for implementing a nature positive agenda

flowchart LR
    subgraph IN["Industry needs"]
        IN1["<p style='width:240px; text-align:left; margin:0px;'><b>Policy drivers</b>
<br>- Nature Positive Plan
<br>- Global Biodiversity Framework
<br>- Federal & state laws & policy
<br>- Business & community activity</p>"]:::INClass
    end
    subgraph LD["Laureate deliverables"]
        D1["<p style='width:250px; text-align:left; margin:0px;'><b>1. Foundational data streams</b>
<br>- National Ecosystem Inventory
<br>- Threats & time series data</p>"]:::DClass
        D2["<p style='width:250px; text-align:left; margin:0px;'><b>2. Training and development</b>
<br>- Reference resources & tools
<br>- Direct learning activities<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;(workshops & e-courses)</p>"]:::DClass
        D3["<p style='width:250px; text-align:left; margin:0px;'><b>3. Applications &<br>proof of concept</b>
<br>- National risk assessments<br>for priority ecosystem themes</p>"]:::DClass
    end
    subgraph PIS["Pathways to Impact"]
    direction LR
    PI1["Australian leadership &<br> global Influence"]:::PIClass2
    PI2["<p style='width:200px; text-align:left; margin:0px;'><b>Implementing action</b>
<br>A Protected areas
<br>B Statutory listings of TEC
<br>C Regional planning
<br>D Regulatory functions
<br>E Ecosystem management
<br>F Conservation programs
<br>G Climate adapatation
<br>H Monitoring & reporting
<br>I Restoration investments</p>"]:::PIClass2
    end
    PIS:::Empty
    LD:::Empty
    IN:::Empty
    K1{{Key<br>capacity<br>needs}}:::Key
    K2{{Industry<br>Transformation}}:::Key
    IN1 --> K1 -->D1 & D2 & D3 --> K2 --> PIS
    classDef Key fill:none, stroke-width:4px, font-weight: bold;
    classDef PIClass2 fill:#ECECBB;
    classDef INClass fill:#96DAE4;
    classDef DClass fill:#CDEEAA;
    classDef Empty fill:none, stroke-width:4px, font-weight: bold, font-size: large;

ARDC (2025)

Last year in May we held a workshop with ARDC to explore the role of research infrastructure in supporting environmental indicators in Australia.

We identifieed a strategic opportunity to elevate environmental indicators from static reporting tools to dynamic instruments for foresight and planning.

Using robust and validated indicators to assess current biodiversity and ecosystem condition and to model future scenarios can lead to more proactive, data-driven policy and decision-making.

This approach not only fulfils international and national reporting obligations but also empowers long-term environmental stewardship through targeted actions that build resilience.

Achieving this requires sustained support to advance scientific knowledge, develop new methods, and deliver outputs in forms that end users can readily adopt.

Environmental Indicators Initiative https://ardc.edu.au/project/environmental-indicators-initiative/

National-Scale Integrated Datasets and Services: https://ardc.edu.au/program/national-scale-integrated-datasets-and-services/

Australia’s diverse ecosystems require tailored indicators for monitoring, assessment, and management.

TF1.6
F2.5
M1.1
T2.5
T1.1
T5.1

TF1.6 Boreal, temperate and montane peat bogs, e.g. Alpine bogs in Tasmania.

F2.5 Ephemeral freshwater lakes, e.g. Menindee Lakes, Lake Cowal, Peery Lake, etc.

Key processes: Water volume-chemistry interactions & trophic web, river inflows

Key threats: Water extraction, water pollution, eutrophication, climate change

M1.1 Seagrass meadows, e.g. Shark Bay in Western Australia

Key processes: Interactions & trophic web, low-energy waves vs. storms

Key threats: Sedimentation, eutrophication, climate change

T2.5 Temperate pyric humid forest: Alpine Ash forests, Jillaga ash, Blue mnts ash, White ash forests, …

Key processes: Vegetation-fire feedbacks, trees as foundation spp for other biota & functions

Key threats: Logging & fire regime shift, climate change

T1.1 Tropical-subtropical lowland rainforest, e.g. Gondwana rainforests, warm temperate rainforests, …

Key processes: Trophic web, gap dynamics, microclimate feedbacks, foundation species

Key threats: Climate change, fire regime shifts, invasive species, logging legacies

T5.1 Semi-desert steppe: Chenopod shrublands, Bluebush sandplains, Hay plain, Stony downs

Key processes: Climate variability, herbivory & trophic regulation

Key threats: Soil degradation, nutrient flux, land use change

Project overview

Why this project?

Bottleneck in scaling indicator development across Australia’s diverse ecosystems.

🚨 Existing approaches

Generic indicators
Fragmented, ad‑hoc analytical methods
Limited scalability & poor reproducibility
Lack of reusable tools & documentation
Hard to develop indicators consistently across ecosystems

🧰 Our Response

Reproducible workflows for fit-for-purpose ecosystem‑specific indicators.

🔧 What We’re Building

Modular, transparent, reproducible workflows
Guided examples for all skill levels
Shared standards: FAIR data, vocabularies & interoperability
A community of practice for collaboration & skill sharing

Conceptual model
Indicator design
Results

Conceptual model
Indicator design
Results

Same as before

New results in same format

Transparent and reproducible

flowchart LR
    IND1>"Indicator 1"]:::WPtodo
    IND2>"Indicator 2"]:::WPtodo
    %%IND3>"Indicator 3"]:::WPtodo
    %%IND4>"Indicator 4"]:::WPtodo
    PLAT1[["Alpine bogs<br>assessment"]]:::WPtodo
    %%PLAT2[["Status of<br>Australian<br>peatlands"]]:::WPtodo
    WF1{WF1}:::WF
    WF2{WF2}:::WF
    %%WF1b{WF2*}:::WF
    ECO1(["Alpine<br>bogs"]):::Ecos
    %%ECO2(["Fleurieu<br>swamp"]):::Ecos
    %%ECO3(["other<br>peatlands"]):::Ecos
    RGA{{"Researcher<br>group A"}}:::RoleCore
    %%RGB{{"Researcher<br>group B"}}:::RoleCore
    RL4(("End Users<br>(state)")):::RoleExt
    %%RL6(("End Users<br>(national)")):::RoleExt
    
    RGA --> ECO1 --> WF1 --> IND1 --> PLAT1
    ECO1 --> WF2 --> IND2 --> PLAT1 
    %%WF2 -.-> WF1b
    %%RGB --> ECO2 & ECO3 --> WF1b --> IND3 & IND4 --> PLAT2
    %%PLAT2 --> RL6
    PLAT1 --> RL4
    classDef WPtodo fill:white,stroke:#E51875,color:#E51875, stroke-width:4px
    classDef WF fill:#E51875,stroke:#E51875,color:white, stroke-width:4px
    classDef Ecos fill:#dfd,stroke:#040,color:#040, stroke-width:2px
    classDef RoleExt fill:#fff,stroke:#8E489B,color:#8E489B, stroke-width:2px
    classDef RoleCore fill:white,stroke:#00B0D5,color:black, stroke-width:4px

FAIR methods and datasets
Update outputs with new data

Scale Up

flowchart LR
    IND1>"Indicator 1"]:::WPtodo
    IND2>"Indicator 2"]:::WPtodo
    IND3>"Indicator 2<br>Fleurieu swamp"]:::WPtodo
    IND4>"Indicator 2<br>other peatlands"]:::WPtodo
    PLAT1[["Alpine bogs<br>assessment"]]:::WPtodo
    PLAT2[["Status of<br>Australian<br>peatlands"]]:::WPtodo
    WF1{WF1}:::WF
    WF2{WF2}:::WF
    WF1b{WF2*}:::WF
    ECO1(["Alpine<br>bogs"]):::Ecos
    ECO2(["Fleurieu<br>swamp"]):::Ecos
    ECO3(["other<br>peatlands"]):::Ecos
    RGA{{"Researcher<br>group A"}}:::RoleCore
    RGB{{"Researcher<br>group B"}}:::RoleCore
    RL4(("End Users<br>(state)")):::RoleExt
    RL6(("End Users<br>(national)")):::RoleExt
    
    RGA --> ECO1 --> WF1 --> IND1 --> PLAT1
    ECO1 --> WF2 --> IND2 --> PLAT1 & PLAT2
    WF2 -.-> WF1b
    RGB --> ECO2 & ECO3 --> WF1b --> IND3 & IND4 --> PLAT2
    PLAT2 --> RL6
    PLAT1 --> RL4
    classDef WPtodo fill:white,stroke:#E51875,color:#E51875, stroke-width:4px
    classDef WF fill:#E51875,stroke:#E51875,color:white, stroke-width:4px
    classDef Ecos fill:#dfd,stroke:#040,color:#040, stroke-width:2px
    classDef RoleExt fill:#fff,stroke:#8E489B,color:#8E489B, stroke-width:2px
    classDef RoleCore fill:white,stroke:#00B0D5,color:black, stroke-width:4px

Aims & Impacts

A framework for developing fit-for-purpose ecosystem-specific indicators

Design modular, transparent, and reproducible workflow adaptable to:
- Different datasets
- Ecosystem types
- Policy and reporting needs

Transparent, defensible, scientifically rigorous indicators

Aims & Impacts

A community of practice for collaboration & skill sharing

Support users with different expertise through guided examples.
Foster a community of practice for collaboration and co‑development.

Increase capacity and empower the user community

Aims & Impacts

Accelerate development of fit-for-purpose ecosystem-specific indicators.

Enable scalable, adaptable ecosystem-specific indicator development.
Track progress across hierarchical levels of ecosystem classification.

Scalable systems supporting national environmental reporting and actionable insights for decision‑making.

Outcomes and beneficiaries

📦 Outcomes

🧩 Core Deliverables

Modular workflow toolbox
Scalable, adaptable indicator workflows
FAIR analysis‑ready datasets
Interoperable tools aligned to shared vocabularies
A connected and empowered user community

👥 Beneficiaries

Researchers: Increased opportunities and alignment with national and international initiatives.
Ecologists & conservation managers: Access to reports supporting monitoring, assessment, management.
Researchers & government agencies: Integrated data + reproducible methods for policy, restoration, reporting.
Programmers with ecosystem knowledge: Contribute to co-design, enable innovation.
Students & early‑career professionals: Skill development in reproducible science, modelling, workflow design.

Work packages

Overview of Work packages

flowchart LR
    WP1["WP1: Establishment"]:::WPtodo
    WP2["WP2: Requirements & planning"]:::WPtodo
    WP3["WP3: Data & Metadata<br>(and tools)"]:::WPtodo
    WP4["WP4: Workflow delivery"]:::WPtodo
    WP5["WP5: Catalogue & dashboard"]:::WPtodo
    WP6["WP6: Community building"]:::WPtodo
    RL1{{"Data<br>Scientists"}}:::RoleCore
    RL2{{"Research<br>software<br>team"}}:::RoleCore
    RL3{{"Community<br>Engagement"}}:::RoleCore
    RL4(("Additional<br>Partners")):::RoleExt
    RL5{{"Research<br>Expertise"}}:::RoleCore
    RL6(("End-user<br>Community")):::RoleExt
    RL7(("Larger<br>Research<br>Community")):::RoleExt
    WP1 --> RL1 & RL2 & RL3 & RL5
    RL1 --> WP4 --> WP5
    RL1 & RL2 --> WP2 --> WP3 & WP4
    RL2 --> WP3 --> WP4
    RL4 -.-> WP3
    RL3 & RL5 --> WP6 --> RL7 --> WP4
    WP1 & WP6 -.-> RL6 --> WP5
    classDef WPtodo fill:white,stroke:#E51875,color:#E51875, stroke-width:4px
    classDef RoleExt fill:#fff,stroke:#8E489B,color:#8E489B, stroke-width:2px
    classDef RoleCore fill:white,stroke:#00B0D5,color:black, stroke-width:4px

Work packages in detail

WP 1

flowchart LR
    A[Work Package 1:<br>Establishment Activities]:::wp

    subgraph Activities
        A1[Recruit & appoint:<br>Project Manager<br>Community Manager<br> Technical roles]:::act
        A2[Establish committees]:::act
        A3[Project web page with DOI]:::act
        A4["ARDC’s FAIR initiation activity"]:::act
    end
    subgraph Deliverables
    D1["All roles fulfilled"]:::del
    D2["Committees established:<br>Fixed membership<br>Meeting schedule<br>Endorsed Terms of Reference"]:::del
    D3["Project web page published"]:::del
    D4["ARDC’s FAIR initiation Activity<br>completed"]:::del
    end
    A --> A1
    A --> A2
    A --> A3
    A --> A4

    A1 --> D1
    A2 --> D2
    A3 --> D3
    A4 --> D4

    Activities:::Empty
    Deliverables:::Empty
    classDef Empty fill:none,stroke:black;
    classDef wp fill:#0b6efd,color:#fff,stroke:#084298,stroke-width:2px;
    classDef act fill:#e7f1ff,color:#052c65,stroke:#9ec5fe,stroke-width:1px;
    classDef del fill:#e8f5e9,color:#1b5e20,stroke:#a5d6a7,stroke-width:1px;

February to March 2026:

UNSW to recruit roles + execute subcontracts
Everyone contributes to shape governance
ARDC/UNSW lead project page

April to May 2026:

ARDC/UNSW lead FAIR initiation

WP 2

flowchart LR
    A["Work Package 2<br>Requirements Gathering &<br>Workflow Development Planning"]:::wp

    subgraph Activities
        A1[Requirements Gathering]:::act
        A2[Implementation Plans]:::act
        A3[Two-year Workflow<br>Development Roadmap]:::act
    end
    
    SubActivities1["Functionality for key user groups<br>Detailed use cases<br>High-level requirements &<br>constraints"]:::act
    
    A2a[PID implementation plan]:::act
    A2b[FAIR4RS implementation plan]:::act


    SubActivities3["Detailed use cases<br>Priorities for Tranche 1<br>Priorities for Tranche 2<br>Review and update requirements"]:::act

    D1["Ecosystem Indicators workflow<br>development plan"]:::del
    D2["Persistent Identifiers (PID)<br>implementation plan"]:::del
    D3["FAIR for datasets &<br>research software (FAIR4RS)<br>implementation plan"]:::del
    

    %% Activity structure
    A --> A1 --> SubActivities1
    A --> A2 --> A2a & A2b
    A --> A3 --> SubActivities3

    %% Activities to Deliverables mapping
    SubActivities1 --> D1
    A2a --> D2
    A2b --> D3
    SubActivities3 --> D1

    %% Styles
    Activities:::Empty
    classDef Empty fill:none,stroke:black;
    classDef wp fill:#0b6efd,color:#fff,stroke:#084298,stroke-width:2px;
    classDef act fill:#e7f1ff,color:#052c65,stroke:#9ec5fe,stroke-width:1px;
    classDef del fill:#e8f5e9,color:#1b5e20,stroke:#a5d6a7,stroke-width:1px;

April to July 2026:

Core Team at UNSW lead development plan
QCIF to contribute
Input from thematic and technical experts
Input from potential users
UNSW/ARDC leading implementation plans

WP 3

flowchart LR
    A[Work Package 3<br>Data & Metadata]:::wp

    subgraph Activities
        A1[Audit vocabularies]:::act
        A2[Audit datasets &<br>data pipelines]:::act
        %%A3[FAIR assessment of<br>identified datasets]:::act
        A4[Transformation<br>& harmonisation tools]:::act
        A5[Data documentation &<br>user guide]:::act
    end
    
    SubActivities1["Global Ecosystem Typology (GET)<br>National/state classifications"]:::act
    SubActivities2["Catalogue datasets<br>Document pipelines & access <br>Record rights & licensing<br>FAIR assessment"]:::act

    SubActivities4[Reusable packaging<br>Automated harmonisation]:::act

    subgraph Deliverables
        D1["Description & publication<br>of relevant vocabularies"]:::del
        D2["Datasets & pipelines<br>documented<br>"]:::del
        D3["Packaged transformation<br>& harmonisation tools/<br>workflows operational"]:::del
        D4["Transformation/harmonisation<br>documented & user guidelines"]:::del
    end

    %% Activity structure
    A --> A1 --> SubActivities1

    A --> A2 --> SubActivities2
    %% --> A3
    A --> A4 --> SubActivities4
    A --> A5

    %% Activities to Deliverables mapping
    SubActivities1 --> D1
    SubActivities2 --> D2
    SubActivities4 --> D3

    %%A3 --> D2

    A5 --> D4
    A4 --> D4

    %% Styles
    Activities:::Empty
    Deliverables:::Empty
    classDef Empty fill:none,stroke:black;
    classDef wp fill:#0b6efd,color:#fff,stroke:#084298,stroke-width:2px;
    classDef act fill:#e7f1ff,color:#052c65,stroke:#9ec5fe,stroke-width:1px;
    classDef del fill:#e8f5e9,color:#1b5e20,stroke:#a5d6a7,stroke-width:1px;

March to April 2026:

UNSW and JCU work on vocabularies, other tools

April to July 2026:

UNSW, QCIF and JCU work on data pipelines tools

May to August 2026:

UNSW and QCIF documenting data pipelines

WP 4

flowchart LR
    A[Work Package 4<br>Workflow Delivery]:::wp

    subgraph Activities
        A1[Develop analysis code]:::act
        A2["Develop & test<br>workflows (incl. end users)"]:::act
        A3[Operationalise<br>platform services]:::act
        A4[Implement PID plan]:::act
        A5["Implement FAIR4RS plan<br>(FAIR4RS)"]:::act
    end

    Subactivity1[Tranche 1 functionality<br>Tranche 1 workflows]:::act
    Subactivity2[Tranche 2 functionality<br>Tranche 2 workflows]:::act
    Subactivity3[Develop operational<br>processes & procedures<br>Deploy & validate<br>on hosting platforms]:::act

    subgraph Deliverables
        D1["Delivery of 1st tranche<br>workflow functionality"]:::del
        D2["Delivery of 2nd tranche<br>workflow functionality"]:::del
        D3["Platform services processes<br> & procedures<br>operational and documented"]:::del
        D4["PID implementation plan<br>implemented"]:::del
        D5["FAIR4RS plan<br> implemented"]:::del
    end

    %% Activity structure
    A --> A1 --> Subactivity1

    A --> A2 --> Subactivity2

    A --> A3 --> Subactivity3

    A --> A4
    A --> A5

    %% Activities to Deliverables mapping
    Subactivity1 --> D1

    Subactivity2 --> D2

    Subactivity3 --> D3

    A4 --> D4
    A5 --> D5

    %% Styles
    Activities:::Empty
    Deliverables:::Empty
    classDef Empty fill:none,stroke:black;
    classDef wp fill:#0b6efd,color:#fff,stroke:#084298,stroke-width:2px;
    classDef act fill:#e7f1ff,color:#052c65,stroke:#9ec5fe,stroke-width:1px;
    classDef del fill:#e8f5e9,color:#1b5e20,stroke:#a5d6a7,stroke-width:1px;

May 2026 to November 2027

UNSW and QCIF work on first (2026) and second (2027) tranche of workflows
Supporting role from thematic experts
Contributions from user community
Contributions from potential end-users

May 2026 to December 2027

Platform services: UNSW and JCU with QCIF? additional partner institutions?
UNSW and QCIF execute implementation plans

WP 5

flowchart LR
    A[Work Package 5<br>Indicator Workflow<br>Catalogue & Dashboard]:::wp

    subgraph Activities
        A1[Requirements gathering<br>with stakeholders & end users]:::act
        A2["Design & Operationalise<br>Catalogue (MVP)"]:::act
        A3[Dashboard App for<br>Indicator Development Tracking]:::act
    end
    A1b["Identify functionality and requiremens<br>for key user groups<br>(Metadata, Integration, User interface)"]:::act
    A2a["Catalogue design<br>Build & deploy MVP"]:::act
    A3a["Design dashboard metrics<br>(views, status/coverage)<br>Build & deploy MVP"]:::act

    subgraph Deliverables
        D1["High-level requirements &<br>constraints documented"]:::del
        D2["User requirements<br>for catalogue/dashboard<br>outlined"]:::del
        D3["Catalogue design<br>documented"]:::del
        D4["Workflow catalogue<br>MVP operational"]:::del
        %%D5["User requirements<br>for dashboard outlined"]:::del
        D6["Dashboard MVP<br>operational"]:::del
    end

    %% Activity structure
    A --> A1 --> A1b
    A --> A2 --> A2a

    A --> A3 --> A3a

    %% Activities to Deliverables mapping
    A1 --> D1
    A1b --> D2

    A2a --> D3 & D4

    %%A3a --> D5
    A3a --> D6

    %% Styles
    Activities:::Empty
    Deliverables:::Empty
    classDef Empty fill:none,stroke:black;
    classDef wp fill:#0b6efd,color:#fff,stroke:#084298,stroke-width:2px;
    classDef act fill:#e7f1ff,color:#052c65,stroke:#9ec5fe,stroke-width:1px;
    classDef del fill:#e8f5e9,color:#1b5e20,stroke:#a5d6a7,stroke-width:1px;

October 2026 to February 2027:

UNSW, JCU and QCIF work on requirements, design
Input from thematic and technical experts
Input from potential users

March 2027 to November 2027:

UNSW, JCU and QCIF work on Minimum Viable Products
Feedback from user community and potential users

WP 6

flowchart LR
    A[Work Package 6<br>Community Building & Engagement,<br>Communication, Skills & Training]:::wp

    subgraph Activities
        A1[Develop Engagement &<br>Communications Plan]:::act
        A2[Grow the Ecosystem Indicator<br>Developer Community]:::act
        A3[Develop training &<br>user support materials]:::act
        A4[Run user workshops]:::act
        A5[Collect & describe<br>user stories]:::act
    end

    Subactivity2[Identify stakeholders<br>Define engagement plan<br>Develop communications &<br>onboarding materials<br>Run community<br>engagement activities]:::act
    Subactivity4[Train users on workflows<br>Test reproducibility<br>Publish code &<br>data outputs from workshops]:::act

    subgraph Deliverables
        D1["Communication & Engagement<br>plan developed"]:::del
        D2["User training & support<br>materials published"]:::del
        D3["User workshops delivered"]:::del
        D4["Published data & code<br>outputs from workshops"]:::del
        D5["User stories published"]:::del
        D6["Engagement & communication<br>activities executed"]:::del
    end

    %% Activity structure
    A --> A1
    A --> A2 --> Subactivity2
    A --> A3
    A --> A4 --> Subactivity4
    A --> A5

    %% Activities to Deliverables mapping
    A1 --> Subactivity2 -->D1
    A3 --> D2

    Subactivity4 --> D3 & D4

    A5 --> D5

    %% Execution of the plan
    
    Subactivity2 --> D6
    %%A3 --> D6
    %%Subactivity4 --> D6

    %% Styles
    Activities:::Empty
    Deliverables:::Empty
    classDef Empty fill:none,stroke:black;
    classDef wp fill:#0b6efd,color:#fff,stroke:#084298,stroke-width:2px;
    classDef act fill:#e7f1ff,color:#052c65,stroke:#9ec5fe,stroke-width:1px;
    classDef del fill:#e8f5e9,color:#1b5e20,stroke:#a5d6a7,stroke-width:1px;

March 2026 to December 2027:

UNSW and ARDC work on communication plan
All contribute to implement communication plan

October 2026 to April 2027:

UNSW, ARDC and QCIF work on training material
All contribute to deliver first community event

May 2026 to Dec 2027

UNSW, ARDC publish user stories
All contribute to deliver second community event

Outputs

Overview of End of Project Outputs

Code	OUTPUT
EOP Output 1	Vocabularies for the Global Ecosystem Typology published in appropriate registry.
EOP Output 2	Relevant datasets assessed for FAIRness, transformed and integrated into defined use cases, with packaged tools, workflows, and user guides made available.
EOP Output 3	FAIR workflow for Ecosystem Indicators Development are integrated into existing national research infrastructure (e.g. EcoCommons).
EOP Output 4	Controlled vocabulary and ontology mapping for ecosystem types published and integrated into data ingestion workflows
EOP Output 5	Engagement activities for the community of Ecosystem Indicator developers

EOP Output 1

OUTPUT	Vocabularies for the Global Ecosystem Typology published in appropriate registry.
WORK PACKAGES	3.1 Data and information foundations
INDICATOR/S	* Vocabularies for the Global Ecosystem Typology published in appropriate registry.
MEASURE	* Persistent identificator of the vocabulary.
DATA SOURCE/S	* Web page of the vocabulary system
TIMELINE FOR DATA COLLECTION	* Systemic and yearly project reports
RESPONSIBILITY	UNSW
BASELINE	No vocabulary currently registered

EOP Output 2

OUTPUT	Relevant datasets assessed for FAIRness, transformed and integrated into defined use cases, with packaged tools, workflows, and user guides made available.
WORK PACKAGES	3.2 Data harmonisation and engineering

INDICATORS:

Proportion of datasets made interoperable and accessible through adoption of community-agreed standards and services.
Proportion of data integration efforts that are documented.
Research needs or translation use cases are clearly defined.
Infrastructure developed or enhanced during the project is documented and maintained beyond project completion.

EOP Output 2

MEASURE:

Datasets meeting interoperability and FAIR standards / total datasets.
Integration reports produced / total integration efforts.
List of use cases in project records.
Availability of documentation & sustainability plan.

Data SOURCE/S:

Progress dashboard tracking coverage of indicators for ecosystem types and level of compliance of FAIR principles for dataset and workflows.

EOP Output 3

OUTPUT	FAIR workflow for Ecosystem Indicators Development are integrated into existing national research infrastructure (e.g. EcoCommons).
WORK PACKAGES	4. System infrastructure

INDICATORS:

System requirements and configuration for integration are documented.
FAIR workflows is accessible through the selected research infrastructure.

EOP Output 3

MEASURE:

Approved system requirements and configuration document. • Availability of a persistent access link (DOI, or equivalent). • Number of FAIR workflows accessible via the platform. • Number of users accessing the workflow via the platform.

Data SOURCE/S:

Web page of the research infraestructure.

EOP Output 4

OUTPUT	Controlled vocabulary and ontology mapping for ecosystem types published and integrated into data ingestion workflows
WORK PACKAGES	Activities 3.1.1, 3.2.1

INDICATORS:

Curated and documented lists of terms, concepts, and their mappings to standard vocabularies or ontologies

EOP Output 4

MEASURE:

• Availability of a persistent access link (DOI, or equivalent).

Data SOURCE/S:

Web page of the vocabulary system

EOP Output 5

OUTPUT	Engagement activities for the community of Ecosystem Indicator developers
WORK PACKAGES	5. Community Building and Engagement, Skills and training

INDICATORS:

Engagement strategy and plan is developed.
Community engagement activities are hosted.
Feedback and recomendations for improvement are documented and incorporated for future community engagement activities.

EOP Output 5

MEASURE:

Engagement strategy and plan approved.
Number of activities conducted (e.g., workshops, hackcton).
Number and diversity of participants (e.g., institutions, roles, gender, age, carreer level).
Participant satisfaction (measured through survey).
Proportion of recommendations integrated into future plans/activities.

Data SOURCE/S:

Satisfaction surveys after each community engagement event (e.g. workshops, hakatons).
Project reports.

Outcomes

Overview of End of Project Outcomes

Code	OUTCOME
EOP Outcome 1	Ecosystem-specific indicator development processes are simplified, streamlined, and more efficient
EOP Outcome 2	Development of ecosystem-specific indicators is accelerated through reproducible, collaborative, and scientifically rigorous methods
EOP Outcome 3	Interoperability and semantic alignment across data, tools, and workflows are strengthened through the use of shared standards and vocabularies
EOP Outcome 4	Stronger collaboration and skills sharing among end users and contributors of the FAIR workflows for Ecosystem Indicators
EOP Outcome 5	Ecosystem monitoring and management frameworks are informed by transparent, reproducible, and collaborative ecosystem-specific indicators based on rigorous scientific principles.